An archaeological dig in Palestine unearths a document. But this is a document with a difference! Could this be one of the ‘eye-witness accounts’ that Luke used when writing his Gospel?
Then an ambiguity in the document provides another archaeologist with a hint. He discovers a skeleton, the oldest yet discovered buried with a Christian text. And beneath that skeleton is another, which might or might not be the skeleton of Jesus.
This does not happen in a vacuum. Christians of all persuasions, Muslims, Israelis, archaeologists, atheist politicians, all try to bend the evidence to suit their own agendas.
What is the truth here? Or is ‘Truth’ the most elusive agenda of them all?